HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally

Posted on May 31, 2009 by ChildHealthSafety

:::: :::::: :: :::: ::::

UK health officials have wrongly assumed the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine can prevent 70 per cent of cases of cervical cancer and press reports show “German experts said the assumptions simply did not stand up to scrutiny, and that women remained at risk“: Experts Cast Doubt on Claim for ‘Wonder’ Cancer Jabs Sunday Express 31 May 2009: Cervical cancer jabs cast into doubt after experts question effectiveness Scotland On Sunday 10th May 2009.

The HPV vaccine can have serious adverse effects with high levels of reported adverse reactions. Death and debilitating illness have been claimed but officials do not acknowledge an association.

Germany’s Robert Koch Institute, which makes recommendations on the public funding of vaccines, is reviewing its programme after 13 experts called for a reassessment of its HPV vaccination programme and an end to “misleading information” about the effectiveness of the jab. A spokeswoman said: “Because of the public discussion and some new reports and new statements from the 13 professors, the committee will publish a statement within the next few weeks.”

Dawn Primarolo MP for Bristol South since 1987

The UK’s New Labour Government has been aggressively pursuing the HPV vaccine programme in schools out of sight of parental control. Some consent forms reportedly have no decline option. There are anecdotal reports of young girls being cross-examined in school corridors by health officials on parental consent issues. British Health Minister Dawn Primarolo isclosely associated with the pursuit of the policy.

The Sunday Express reports Professor Martina Doren, of the Charitie Hospital in Berlin:

What concerns us is that the two manufacturers of the vaccine aren’t always using facts. They claim that a lot of high-risk strains of cancer-causing virus are protected against but equally there are others that are not. If protection is not more than 20 per cent then that is an awful lot of money to be spending, particularly as the vaccines have quite serious side-effects.”

A spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Cervarix, was unable to provide figures on cases of pre-cancerous cells in women who have taken the vaccine, compared with those who have not.

Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Mary Scanlon said: “Given this new research, it is now incumbent on the Scottish Government and the chief medical officer to review the vaccination programme to ensure that it lives up to the expectations of preventing cervical cancer.”

The HPV vaccine programme is based on recommendations of the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. This highlights questions over the competence of the UK’s JCVI to make recommendations on UK vaccination programmes and the competence of medical professionals in general to express opinions on scientific matters.

The JCVI has a documented history of recklessness over vaccination policy and a needle-happy reputation along with concerns about financial and other conflicts of interest: Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action but from April 1 this year has been given in unfettered control of UK Government vaccination policy for England: UK Government Hands Drug Industry Control of Childhood Vaccination. And as the British Medical Journal confirms Doctors are not scientists: Doctors are not scientists — Smith 328 (7454): BMJ.

If the vaccine is not effective, then its adverse effects cannot be justified but in the UK we see no official comment on the vaccine’s risk profile. This highlights how public safety issues fail to be addressed as a result of what some claim is a quasi-religious belief created by the drug industry in the importance of vaccines and the fear medical professionals have of making public criticisms on safety grounds.

The push for mass vaccination is driven by the commercial interest of the drug industry in moving to new business models. Financial markets have known for 20 years and more the pharmaceutical industry’s blockbuster patented drugs business model would eventualy fail

The Bill Gates’ Microsoft type business model is one of the emerging replacements – almost everyone has Windows software on their PC – almost everyone will be vax’ed. Gates quickly became a multi-billionaire. With vastly more people to vaccinate than computers requiring software the lure of money for the pharmaceutical industry is substantial.

Alongside the expansion of vaccination programmes the childhood prevalence of lifetime conditions like asthma, allergies, autism, diabetes and others requiring further medications have increased substantially.

______________________________________________________________

Discover more from ____Child Health Safety_

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Barak Obama, Child Health Safety, Disease Statistics, Hannah Poling, John Poling, MMR, Obama, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Andrew Wakefield, Aspergers, autism, Barak Obama, Baron Cohen, CDC, David Kirby, fraud, genetic, genetics, Hannah Poling, immunisation, jokes, Jon Poling, Julie Gerberding, MMR, Obama, Professor Baron Cohen, Professor Simon Baron Cohen, research, research fraud, Simon Baron Cohen, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine adverse reaction, Vaccine Damage, vaccine risks, Vaccines, Wakefield |

« There Is No “Anti-Vaccine” Movement Compulsory Vaccination for Wales »

9 Responses

Andrew, on May 31, 2009 at 10:49 am said:

Not only do we find that our politicians had their fingers in the public purse but their snouts feeding from the trough of big pharma.
It gets worse when you consider that people like Dawn Primarolo are not only gullible enough to acfcept all this junk and currupt corporate from big pharma but try to enfoce it on the rest of.
I can’t see Dawn Primarolo admitting she and her cohorts may put the long the term health at risk for hundrreds of thousands girls based on aggresive corporate marketing and bad science.
Indiscriminate needle sticking « Blogging On The Ragged Edge, on May 31, 2009 at 12:11 pm said:

[…] Indiscriminate needle sticking https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/germany-hpv/ […]
HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally — Holy Hormones, Honey!, on May 31, 2009 at 2:03 pm said:

[…] Child Heath Safety […]
Jack Humphries, on May 31, 2009 at 10:50 pm said:

I sent various pieces of specific vacine data with questions to my MP and he forwarded this to Primarolo. She replied with a kind of proforma that had little relevance to my data or questions; I sent additional data, she replied via that MP with the same proforma which of course had, by this time, virtually no relevance to my questions.

Neither my MP nor Primarolo provided what I would consider to be a satisfactory, or even relevant, response to my questions and the MP in effect did not even get involved, he merely “shuffled” the papers backwards and forwards.

These are people UK citizens entrust their children’s health and futures to.
More Bad News For Big Pharma HPV Efficacy In Question — An Inconvenient Woman, on June 3, 2009 at 8:07 am said:

[…] Child Heath Safety […]
HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally — Holy Hormones, Honey!, on June 27, 2009 at 4:13 am said:

[…] Child Health Safety […]
John Fryer, on July 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm said:

The biggest flaw in this vaccine that goes against known science is the series of three vaccines.

Most people survive the first shot, most the second and most the third.

But the people dying are usually those at the end of the series of three rather than at the first shot.

And the biggest flaw in their death is that the families probably aren’t linking the deaths to the vaccines. Doctors by now will be doing all they can to save this woman or young girl and will probably attract much praise from the family of the dying lady.

If after all this Russian Roulette they try to get recognition of harm they do not play Russian Roulette but they have the UK governments promise of two chances for recompense of which the best of the two chances is no chance.

The fact that we still use the vaccine shows that it must be “good” or the governments concerned are not good.

Anyone condoning three shots where one only is obligatory for safety should be put in prison for attempted murder.
Godofredo Arauzo, on February 10, 2011 at 12:04 am said:

OPEN LETTER TO MINISTER OF HEALTH OF PERU

Huancayo Peru February 5, 2011

Minister of Health of Peru
Lima

SUBJECT: REQUEST MORATORIUM ON HPV VACCINE NOT BE TESTED FOR MEDICAL OR SCIENTIFIC TO PREVENT CERVICAL CARCINOMA; NEWLY FOUND BETWEEN 2025-2030.
Of my highest consideration
:
I am writing. knowledge to make EsSalud of Huancayo, La Libertad, Arequipa, Sabogal, Rebagliati and Beacon have started vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) says in its advertising because it is the one that causes cervical carcinoma (UCC). There are several suspicious factors that favor the appearance of CCU including HPV, but this virus does not fulfill Koch’s postulate for consideration as the causative agent of the CCU, as EsSalud and manufacturers are promoting en masse. This vaccine is made from a virus laboratory has no toxicity study has been investigated in 11.000 and in only 5 years. They say that investigated by indirect methods, direct methods do not realistic nor ethical (Harper 2008). The vaccine was approved by the FDA for marketing in only 6 months and 9 months in Spain, when this term is 3 years prior to approval of Gardasil was tested on only 1,200 women, refuse companies selling vaccines provide data on the money invested in the propaganda (Systematic Medicine from 1911 to 2010). The vaccine was licensed for use only in youth that had not started having sex but are vaccinating women up to the 45.años;. yes there is evidence that vaccinating women infected with HPV, would increase by 44.6% CCU (Jara M 2010), the phase II clinical trial has not been published (Laurel AC 2009), vaccination is not justified, is a big business (Science Network 2009) and there is a blatant advertising campaign exaggerating the risk (Cam-Men 2009), in Spain for research has determined that prevent cervical cancer caused by HPV, it would cost 8 million euros, which is statistically unacceptable. Furthermore, the World Association for Cancer Research (WACRA) said the letter medical or scientifically been shown to be effective and in Europe two associations have formed a close of15, 000 leading researchers engaged in cancer and other association families affected by those seeking a moratorium vaccine until they determine their effectiveness, which will be only on 2025-2030. In USA has formed a group “The Truth About Gardasil” to women who ask to ban the so-called vaccine against cervical carcinoma which they accuse of having ruined the lives of their daughters and in some cases murdered if any . The HPV vaccine is not effective or safe, and prevent cervical cancer (http://isabeldelafuente.ning.com/forum/topics/ineficacia-y-peligrosidad-de?xg_source=activity).
According to VAERS (acronym in English), System Reporting Adverse Vaccine Caused by the U.S. government to date in the U.S. alone there have been 81 deaths and over 20,000 adverse reactions, of whom 6% to 10 % were serious and only reported by 1% to 10%, extrapolating this data then there have been about 200,000 deaths and 810 adverse events (VAERS Report 2009) In India, vaccination was discontinued because caused 6 deaths (Dempeus 2010); after vaccination were two deaths in Austria and one in Germany (Suppository 2010), in Valencia a child had seizures after vaccination and currently remains in a wheelchair, another teenager 16 years old after the shot looks like a 50 year old person (Serra MJ 2009), in USA in February 2009 there were 638 serious adverse events: 544 seizures, 34 thrombosis, 9 and 51 cardiac arrests alopecia (Lleida, 2009); after injection there were 28 abortions (GineBlog 2009), 35 girls suffered severe reactions, two remain hospitalized (elPeriodico.Com 2009), in the Balearic a girl suffered 14 seizures a day after vaccination (diariodemallorca.es 2009), scientists from Spain, Germany and Canada require a moratorium on the vaccine until strong evidence of the safety and efficiency (Lajornada 2009), its effectiveness will be determined only on 2025-2030 (CHER 2010), the vaccinations are unjustified and are big business (Science Network 2009) and the high cost $ 1000 all 3 doses.
Dr. Bernat Soria Spain’s Health Minister says: “missing studies, evidence of adverse effects and uses up the budget for public health”, Dr. Carlos Alberto Dardet Professor of Public Health at the University of Alicante, Spain, and Director ournal of Epidemiology and Community Health says the HPV vaccine is: Fraud?, Scam?, Robo?, is the marketing of fear, the researcher says John Servas is a joke to the health of women.:
The pharmaceutical industry introduced drugs harmful to health: the etilestilbestrol that was used between the decades of 40 to 70 in women, especially pregnant women, was banned because it was found that originated the clear cell carcinoma in the vagina of women and changes genitourinary morphological tree, favoring estrogen breast carcinoma, thanks to research from the Women Health Initiative (WHI) was stopped being used, the thalidomina, the sweetener aspartame and more recently the massive and unnecessary mandatory vaccine influenza A in complicity with the WHO (Forcades 2009). Between 2000-2003 nearly all U.S. pharmaceutical companies spent by the court on charges of fraud and forced to pay more than $ 2.2 billion, 4 of them acknowledged their responsibility for criminal acts (http://www.scribd .com/doc/20359792/CRIMENES-FARMACEUTICOS-TERESA-FORCADES).
For the reasons apply to his office, Mr. Minister, issue a resolution declaring a moratorium on the vaccine against human papillomavirus, pending determination of their effectiveness, which is just between 2025-2030, our countrymen are not the guinea pig TNCs and the state will not squander their meager resources in an uncertain vaccine, in the experimental stage and no proven effective medical or scientific.
Carefully
Dr. Godfrey Araujo
Email: godo_ara@hotmail.com
Tel: 05164252052
New Research Shows How Gardasil and Cervarix Vaccines Can Silently Kill Your Daughters And Sons « ________________Child Health Safety_________________, on October 25, 2012 at 10:02 am said:

[…] HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally […]

Andrew, on May 31, 2009 at 10:49 am said:

Not only do we find that our politicians had their fingers in the public purse but their snouts feeding from the trough of big pharma.
It gets worse when you consider that people like Dawn Primarolo are not only gullible enough to acfcept all this junk and currupt corporate from big pharma but try to enfoce it on the rest of.
I can’t see Dawn Primarolo admitting she and her cohorts may put the long the term health at risk for hundrreds of thousands girls based on aggresive corporate marketing and bad science.

Indiscriminate needle sticking « Blogging On The Ragged Edge, on May 31, 2009 at 12:11 pm said:

[…] Indiscriminate needle sticking https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/05/31/germany-hpv/ […]

HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally — Holy Hormones, Honey!, on May 31, 2009 at 2:03 pm said:

[…] Child Heath Safety […]

Jack Humphries, on May 31, 2009 at 10:50 pm said:

I sent various pieces of specific vacine data with questions to my MP and he forwarded this to Primarolo. She replied with a kind of proforma that had little relevance to my data or questions; I sent additional data, she replied via that MP with the same proforma which of course had, by this time, virtually no relevance to my questions.

Neither my MP nor Primarolo provided what I would consider to be a satisfactory, or even relevant, response to my questions and the MP in effect did not even get involved, he merely “shuffled” the papers backwards and forwards.

These are people UK citizens entrust their children’s health and futures to.

More Bad News For Big Pharma HPV Efficacy In Question — An Inconvenient Woman, on June 3, 2009 at 8:07 am said:

HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally — Holy Hormones, Honey!, on June 27, 2009 at 4:13 am said:

[…] Child Health Safety […]

John Fryer, on July 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm said:

The biggest flaw in this vaccine that goes against known science is the series of three vaccines.

Most people survive the first shot, most the second and most the third.

But the people dying are usually those at the end of the series of three rather than at the first shot.

And the biggest flaw in their death is that the families probably aren’t linking the deaths to the vaccines. Doctors by now will be doing all they can to save this woman or young girl and will probably attract much praise from the family of the dying lady.

If after all this Russian Roulette they try to get recognition of harm they do not play Russian Roulette but they have the UK governments promise of two chances for recompense of which the best of the two chances is no chance.

The fact that we still use the vaccine shows that it must be “good” or the governments concerned are not good.

Anyone condoning three shots where one only is obligatory for safety should be put in prison for attempted murder.

Godofredo Arauzo, on February 10, 2011 at 12:04 am said:

OPEN LETTER TO MINISTER OF HEALTH OF PERU

Huancayo Peru February 5, 2011

Minister of Health of Peru
Lima

SUBJECT: REQUEST MORATORIUM ON HPV VACCINE NOT BE TESTED FOR MEDICAL OR SCIENTIFIC TO PREVENT CERVICAL CARCINOMA; NEWLY FOUND BETWEEN 2025-2030.
Of my highest consideration
:
I am writing. knowledge to make EsSalud of Huancayo, La Libertad, Arequipa, Sabogal, Rebagliati and Beacon have started vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) says in its advertising because it is the one that causes cervical carcinoma (UCC). There are several suspicious factors that favor the appearance of CCU including HPV, but this virus does not fulfill Koch’s postulate for consideration as the causative agent of the CCU, as EsSalud and manufacturers are promoting en masse. This vaccine is made from a virus laboratory has no toxicity study has been investigated in 11.000 and in only 5 years. They say that investigated by indirect methods, direct methods do not realistic nor ethical (Harper 2008). The vaccine was approved by the FDA for marketing in only 6 months and 9 months in Spain, when this term is 3 years prior to approval of Gardasil was tested on only 1,200 women, refuse companies selling vaccines provide data on the money invested in the propaganda (Systematic Medicine from 1911 to 2010). The vaccine was licensed for use only in youth that had not started having sex but are vaccinating women up to the 45.años;. yes there is evidence that vaccinating women infected with HPV, would increase by 44.6% CCU (Jara M 2010), the phase II clinical trial has not been published (Laurel AC 2009), vaccination is not justified, is a big business (Science Network 2009) and there is a blatant advertising campaign exaggerating the risk (Cam-Men 2009), in Spain for research has determined that prevent cervical cancer caused by HPV, it would cost 8 million euros, which is statistically unacceptable. Furthermore, the World Association for Cancer Research (WACRA) said the letter medical or scientifically been shown to be effective and in Europe two associations have formed a close of15, 000 leading researchers engaged in cancer and other association families affected by those seeking a moratorium vaccine until they determine their effectiveness, which will be only on 2025-2030. In USA has formed a group “The Truth About Gardasil” to women who ask to ban the so-called vaccine against cervical carcinoma which they accuse of having ruined the lives of their daughters and in some cases murdered if any . The HPV vaccine is not effective or safe, and prevent cervical cancer (http://isabeldelafuente.ning.com/forum/topics/ineficacia-y-peligrosidad-de?xg_source=activity).
According to VAERS (acronym in English), System Reporting Adverse Vaccine Caused by the U.S. government to date in the U.S. alone there have been 81 deaths and over 20,000 adverse reactions, of whom 6% to 10 % were serious and only reported by 1% to 10%, extrapolating this data then there have been about 200,000 deaths and 810 adverse events (VAERS Report 2009) In India, vaccination was discontinued because caused 6 deaths (Dempeus 2010); after vaccination were two deaths in Austria and one in Germany (Suppository 2010), in Valencia a child had seizures after vaccination and currently remains in a wheelchair, another teenager 16 years old after the shot looks like a 50 year old person (Serra MJ 2009), in USA in February 2009 there were 638 serious adverse events: 544 seizures, 34 thrombosis, 9 and 51 cardiac arrests alopecia (Lleida, 2009); after injection there were 28 abortions (GineBlog 2009), 35 girls suffered severe reactions, two remain hospitalized (elPeriodico.Com 2009), in the Balearic a girl suffered 14 seizures a day after vaccination (diariodemallorca.es 2009), scientists from Spain, Germany and Canada require a moratorium on the vaccine until strong evidence of the safety and efficiency (Lajornada 2009), its effectiveness will be determined only on 2025-2030 (CHER 2010), the vaccinations are unjustified and are big business (Science Network 2009) and the high cost $ 1000 all 3 doses.
Dr. Bernat Soria Spain’s Health Minister says: “missing studies, evidence of adverse effects and uses up the budget for public health”, Dr. Carlos Alberto Dardet Professor of Public Health at the University of Alicante, Spain, and Director ournal of Epidemiology and Community Health says the HPV vaccine is: Fraud?, Scam?, Robo?, is the marketing of fear, the researcher says John Servas is a joke to the health of women.:
The pharmaceutical industry introduced drugs harmful to health: the etilestilbestrol that was used between the decades of 40 to 70 in women, especially pregnant women, was banned because it was found that originated the clear cell carcinoma in the vagina of women and changes genitourinary morphological tree, favoring estrogen breast carcinoma, thanks to research from the Women Health Initiative (WHI) was stopped being used, the thalidomina, the sweetener aspartame and more recently the massive and unnecessary mandatory vaccine influenza A in complicity with the WHO (Forcades 2009). Between 2000-2003 nearly all U.S. pharmaceutical companies spent by the court on charges of fraud and forced to pay more than $ 2.2 billion, 4 of them acknowledged their responsibility for criminal acts (http://www.scribd .com/doc/20359792/CRIMENES-FARMACEUTICOS-TERESA-FORCADES).
For the reasons apply to his office, Mr. Minister, issue a resolution declaring a moratorium on the vaccine against human papillomavirus, pending determination of their effectiveness, which is just between 2025-2030, our countrymen are not the guinea pig TNCs and the state will not squander their meager resources in an uncertain vaccine, in the experimental stage and no proven effective medical or scientific.
Carefully
Dr. Godfrey Araujo
Email: godo_ara@hotmail.com
Tel: 05164252052

New Research Shows How Gardasil and Cervarix Vaccines Can Silently Kill Your Daughters And Sons « ________________Child Health Safety_________________, on October 25, 2012 at 10:02 am said:

[…] HPV Vaccine Questioned Internationally […]

____Child Health Safety_

Email Subscription

Key Data for Parents

Recent Posts

Pages